Download the supporting and various whitepapers, studies and brochures.
Shoulder
BLUEPRINT
BLUEPRINT 3D Planning: Surgeon-controlled planning software that allows the surgeon to virtually implant a Stryker shoulder prosthesis on a 3D image of the patient’s shoulder, prior to the procedure.
PSI – Patient Specific Instrumentation: Our BLUEPRINT software can precisely transfer the surgeon-created case plan into the operating room with the help of a 3D printed device, used as a guide during the procedure. This is typically a custom guide for accurate k-wire placement in the glenoid, designed specifically for the patient.4,5,6,7
Contact Clinical Sales SpecialistUSPs
- Surgeon-controlled 3D planning software.
- 3D visualisation and virtual implantation.
- Real-time manipulation of a chosen implant to visualize the bone-preserving capabilities of implants.
Benefits
- Convenient surgical planning without the wait.
- The BLUEPRINT Cloud helps to reduce unnecessary barriers for surgeons, sales reps, and scan techs.
- Surgeons can create a plan based on their surgical preferences and the unique anatomical presentation of each patient.
- Precise and reproducible 3D measurements.
- Provides a better view of the glenoid morphology to visualize wear patterns.
- Enables a surgeon to plan and order patient-specific guided instrumentation.
- Enables accurate glenoid positioning, a critical component of glenoid implant longevity.
BLUEPRINT
This video demos a walkthrough of Blueprint, the surgeon-controlled planning software that allows the surgeon to virtually implant a Stryker shoulder prosthesis on a 3D image of the patient’s shoulder, prior to the procedure.
Downloads
References
- Bryce CD1, Davison AC, Lewis GS, Wang L, Flemming DJ, Armstrong AD. Two-dimensional glenoid version measurements vary with coronal and sagittal scapular rotation.
- Bokor DJ, O’Sullivan MD, Hazan GJ. Variability of measurements of glenoid version oncomputed tomography scan. JSES, Volume 8, No 6. 1999:595-598
- Hoenecke HR Jr1, Hermida JC, Flores-Hernandez C, D’Lima DD. Accuracy of CT based measurements of glenoid version for total shoulder arthroplasty.
- Papadonikolakis A et al. Failure of the glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of the English-language literature between 2006 and 2012. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Dec 18;95(24):2205-12.
- Walch G, Young A, Melis, Gazielly D, Loew M, Boileau P. Results of a convex-back cemented keeled glenoid component in primary osteroarthritis: multicenter study with a follow-up greater than 5 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2011) 20; 285-294
- Walch G, Vezeridis P, Boileau P, Deransart P, Eng M, Chaoui. Three-dimensional planning and use of patient-specific guides improve glenoid component position: an in vitro study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 24, 302-309
- Villatte G, Muller AS, Pereira B, Mulliez A, Reilly P, et al. (2018) Use of Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) for glenoid component positioning in shoulder arthroplasty. A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 13(8): e0201759. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0201759
- Moineau G1, Levigne C, Boileau P, Young A, Walch G. Three-dimensional measurement method of arthritic glenoid cavity morphology: Feasibility and Reproducibility.
- Lewis GS, Armstrong AD. Glenoid spherical orientation and version.